Encyclopedia  |   World Factbook  |   World Flags  |   Reference Tables  |   List of Lists     
   Academic Disciplines  |   Historical Timeline  |   Themed Timelines  |   Biographies  |   How-Tos     
Sponsor by The Tattoo Collection
Homo economicus
Main Page | See live article | Alphabetical index

Homo economicus

Homo economicus, or Economic man, is a term used for an approximation of Homo sapiens that acts to obtain the highest possible well-being given available information about opportunities. This approach has been formalized in certain social science models, particularly in certain economic models.

As in social science in general, these assumptions are at best approximations. The term is often used derogatorily in academic literature, perhaps most commonly by sociologists, who tend to prefer structural explanations to ones based on rational action by individuals.

Homo economicus bases his choices only the consideration of his own personal "utility function". To the extent that this utility function does not consider the well-being of others, Homo economicus is selfish. Some believe such assumptions about humans are unethical. Economists tend to disagree, arguing that it may be relevant to analyze the consequences of enlightened egoism just as it may be worthwile to consider altruistic or social behavior.

How is Homo economicus rational? Usually in the sense that well-being as defined by the utility function is optimzed given perceived opportunities. See rational choice theory and rational expectations for further discussion; the article on rationality widens the discussion.

The Austrian School criticise homo economicus as an actor for economic forecasting. They stress uncertainty in the making of economic decisions, rather than relying on the rational man who is fully informed of all circumstances impinging on his decisions. They argue that perfect knowledge never exists, means that all economic activity implies risk.

Many critics of the dominant neo-classical economics use "Homo economicus" as a straw man target. "Real people do not have cost-less access to infinite information and an inbuilt ability to process it, in no time at all." However, at advanced level economics, scholars have found ways of acknowledging these facts. When looking at some of the advanced work in the field HE is modified enough to be a realistic picture of some decision making, and the critics are targeting a straw man. It is primarily when targeting the limiting assumptions made in constructing undergrad models that the criticisms are valid.

Comparisons between economics and sociology have resulted in a corresponding term Homo sociologicus, to parody the image of human nature given in sociological models. Hirsch, Michaels, and Friedman (1990, p. 44) say that homo sociologicus is largely a tabula rasa upon which societies and cultures write values and goals; unlike economicus, sociologicus acts not to pursue selfish interests but to fulfill social roles. Sociologicus may appear all society and no individual.

Table of contents
1 See also
2 References
3 External link

See also


External link

http://www.korpios.org/resurgent/L-homoeconomicus.htm, which simultaneously explains and debunks economic models based on Homo Economicus, claiming that such models serve the political interests of more conservative economists.